We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Was the Challenger Disaster?

Michael Anissimov
By
Updated May 21, 2024
Our promise to you
All The Science is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At All The Science, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The Challenger disaster occurred when the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded over the Atlantic Ocean 73 seconds after launch, on the morning of 28 January 1986. All seven astronauts on board, including the first member of the Teacher in Space Project, Christa McAuliffe, were killed. The disaster caused a 32-month moratorium on shuttle launches and the formation of the Rogers Commission, which included Nobel laureate Richard Feynman, to investigate the cause of the tragic incident.

After an investigation, the Rogers Commission found that the Challenger disaster was caused by the failure of an O-ring seal on a solid rocket booster at liftoff. This created a breach which allowed combustible material from inside the booster to impinge upon the adjacent and much larger external tank, leading to structural failure. The solid booster also separated from the shuttle. This perturbed the aerodynamic equilibrium of the craft, causing it to break apart. Various portions of the craft were submitted to acceleration factors of as much as 20g, well over its design limits. At such high speeds, this is very fast and deadly. After an extensive search, many components of the Shuttle were recovered from the sea floor. Some of the crew’s remains were buried at the Challenger Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery.

The Challenger disaster is a case study in the inherent danger of spaceflight. On 1 February 2003, the spacecraft Columbia disintegrated on reentry, killing another seven astronauts, showing that the Space Shuttle has more than one catastrophic failure mode.

The Rogers Commission found that NASA’s organizational culture was a primary reason for the accident. Managers at NASA were aware of a weakness in the O-rings since 1977, nine years earlier, but had failed to address it. These weaknesses were due to a temperature-vulnerable design in the O-ring by an external contractor, Morton Thiokol. The launch took place after an especially cold night during which ice accumulated on the tanks and caused the O-rings to drop below their minimum operating temperature. Even just a couple seconds after launch, the O-ring failure already allowed superheated gas to escape from the side of the solid rocket booster. By a little more than a minute after launch, it resulted in the abnormal plume and the cascade of effects which led to the destruction of the Challenger.

All The Science is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Michael Anissimov
By Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov is a dedicated All The Science contributor and brings his expertise in paleontology, physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and futurism to his articles. An avid blogger, Michael is deeply passionate about stem cell research, regenerative medicine, and life extension therapies. His professional experience includes work with the Methuselah Foundation, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, and Lifeboat Foundation, further showcasing his commitment to scientific advancement.
Discussion Comments
By AnswerMan — On Jul 11, 2014

I watched the Challenger launch live on TV, and I remember it wasn't covered like previous launches. The networks only cut away from regular programming at the countdown, and they went back to it for a few minutes without realizing what had happened. These space shuttle launches were getting to be routine at the time, and I never thought I'd see one of them end like that.

I remember there was some debate over the weather, because it got down into the 20s the night before the launch. I think they decided to wait until it got a little warmer before signing off on the mission. The lift-off itself seemed to move in slow motion, and I thought it didn't look normal. I still can't hear the words "go with throttle up" without wincing. It was a true national tragedy.

By Inaventu — On Jul 10, 2014

I was living near Huntsville, Alabama when the Challenger disaster took place, and many of the engineers and support crews had to be called into work to figure out what went wrong. It was a very tense time, since all the various contractors were trying to put the blame on each other for the failure. It took a long time to narrow the problem down to the O-rings and the temperature.

I remember turning on the television that morning and watching what I thought was the launch live on CNN. It turned out to be the first repeat after the accident, and I heard one of the announcers say "Okay, this is when the problem started." Ten seconds later, I saw the explosion. I thought I was watching a Hollywood disaster movie.

Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov is a dedicated All The Science contributor and brings his expertise in paleontology, physics, biology...
Learn more
All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.