We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Nuclear Energy?

By Jacob Queen
Updated May 21, 2024
Our promise to you
All The Science is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At All The Science, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Nuclear energy is simply a term describing any energy associated with atomic reactions. These can be created by people, but they also happen through natural processes. An example of all-natural nuclear energy would be the nuclear fusion process that fuels stars like the sun. In a more practical sense, when most people refer to nuclear energy, they are referring to the human method of harnessing that energy in nuclear power plants. People haven't yet discovered a way to take advantage of nuclear fusion, which could potentially be incredibly powerful and highly efficient—they use the nuclear fission process to create energy instead.

In a sense, nuclear fission is the opposite of nuclear fusion. With the nuclear fission process, tiny little particles are thrown at atoms until they break apart and become smaller atoms. Every time this happens, a little bit of energy is released, and other particles are also released that continue to break apart the smaller atoms. This process goes on and on, creating a domino effect and continually building more and more heat. In nuclear fusion, small atoms come together and bigger atoms are formed, which releases massive quantities of energy.

Mankind uses fission in power plants because it is an easier kind of nuclear energy to control. People have the technology to create fusion as well, and the hydrogen bomb would be an example of that, but there is too much energy involved in fusion reactions, and nobody has found a way to make it safely usable as a power source. Scientists continue to try to unlock the mysteries of controllable fusion reactions.

Nuclear power plants actually work like most other electrical power plants. The heat from the nuclear reaction is used to raise the temperature of water, which generates steam. The power of the steam turns turbines that generate electricity through friction. It's actually not that much different than hydroelectric energy or the way coal power plants work. The big difference is the way the heat is generated.

There is a lot of possible danger in nuclear power plants, but they also have the potential to benefit the environment. On the one hand, a disaster called a meltdown could happen, and many people could be injured or killed, but on the other hand, nuclear power plants don't pollute the air in the same way that coal plants do. Nuclear plants also produce radioactive waste, and finding ways to safely dispose of this waste can be difficult.

All The Science is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Discussion Comments
By anon252922 — On Mar 07, 2012

The world needs this but also dos not.

By Renegade — On Jan 20, 2011

@SilentBlue

It may be that things would change drastically, but I firmly believe that in the long run, it would be for the better. Do we want our children and grandchildren continuing to fight and kill each other in order to sap the world of its oil?

By SilentBlue — On Jan 18, 2011

@arod2b42

Perhaps this is a secret that is kept under lockdown for the sake of the economy. Switching to a different kind of energy could cause upheavals in companies and politics around the world. We should probably tread softly when dealing with these matters.

By arod2b42 — On Jan 17, 2011

Nuclear energy would be second only to hydrogen energy, which would only generate steam and would have no harm to the environment. This kind of energy would be much longer-lasting than gas, and much less expensive. Probably the only thing that is stopping it from advancing is the fact that people make more money off of selling gas/petrol. However, more people also die for gas/petrol, and the only thing stopping hydrogen energy from advancing is the lack of public awareness of its existence and demand for a large-scale switch.

By BostonIrish — On Jan 15, 2011

Nuclear energy would be helpful for two big reasons. I think that switching to a usage of nuclear energy would be safe and sustainable for our environment. There will also be the effect of pulling the oil-power rug out from under the great gas companies and middle eastern regimes.

All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.